Layers Of Decentralization

In todays globalized world, centralized web2 players take an ever more important part in our lives. By using the data their users give away eagerly and with consent, they are able to influence which news we read online, which content we consume, which ads trick us into buying things we don’t really need and many other business models. The vision of a decentralized web3 challenges business models of data-driven internet giants. It aims to give back data ownership to individual users. Unfortunately, decentralization in itself does not only bring benefits to users. It also comes with a whole new set of challenges, risks and attack angles.

Exploiting a concept.

Decentralization is occasionally being used as a keyword or concept to cover up projects embedded within a global grey zone of anonymous “DAOs” that are trying to evade any form of legal responsibility for damaging and self-enriching behaviour, or to straight up exploit the lack of legislation to set up and commit fraud. Rug Pulls and deliberately installed backdoors to exploit, hack and steal users assets are unfortunately not an isolated instance in the world of crypto assets.

One of the most famous and blunt cases was the (claimed to be) “decentralized and trustless network” Squid Game Token. Claiming to be part of a bigger soon to be launched blockchain gaming application, it created an immense wave of hype. Even mainstream media fired it up, and eventually it ended up as a massive rug pull when user noticed there was no way to exit from the project and all of a sudden the liquidity pools were drained. But how can such a disaster happen with a “decentralized” and “DAO governed” project?

What is “Decentralization”?

The three main pillars of blockchain technology are immutability, transparency, and decentralization. Even though all of them are in the end equally important to the concept, the decentralization pillar is often misunderstood. Digital assets tend to be (if we count out certain outliers such as Tether or very early stage projects) decentralized. That simply means that a certain number of validators draw a blockchain consensus. That effectively eliminates “centralized” counterparty risk and exploitation by this centralized entity.

Despite most commonly known digital assets formally being decentralized, there are big differences in their level of decentralization. Decentralized Autonomous Organisations (DAOs) serve as a backbone for the decentralized economy. They receive a lot of attention in the sphere of decentralization and decentralized governance. Decentralized Autonomous Organisations have formed more or less naturally and gained attention as a response to very high counterparty risk in the poorly regulated and supervised digital asset ecosystem. A good example of counterparty risk that has caused a sizeable financial woe to investors is the recent case of FTX. In this case customer assets were either gambled away or seized in bankruptcy proceedings.

What the concept of DAO is trying to do differently is that it allows full transparency over the whole project. That includes treasury of foundations, staked assets, assets bonded in smart contracts, and self-custodianship over personal assets. You can interact with open and transparent protocols. You can also commit to changing and improving the product. However, the private keys remain under your control.

Centralization risk of Decentralized Autonomous Organizations

Even though DAOs are here to reduce counter-party risk and create trustless networks managed by an open and transparent governing body, sadly cases like Squid Game Token are still happening due to their close connection with the projects and the lack of decentralization at their core. Decentralized Autonomous Organizations function on a basis of vote proposals and voting to apply changes on the blockchain. The more assets an individual has staked, the more votes the individual has. As DAO functions on the Proof of Stake mechanism. One or a few stakeholders can highly centralize the voting power by making the whole protocol centralized in its core.

In case DAO governs the protocol, but de facto has highly centralized voting power on a single entity, the entity can run changes however they see fit. Liquidity pools can be drained, rewards can be locked, and tokenomics proposals can be rigged in the favor of the controlling group.

Not every ‘relatively centralized’ DAO intends to engage in fraudulent behavior

The main problem with a high level of decentralization is, besides the fragmented thus slower network, the cost to run the network. Decentralization requires a higher number of validators. They will need a financial incentive to run the hardware, as well as stake themselves or in delegated PoS attract (aka share financial incentives with) a significant sum of assets to become qualified validators. The cost is a primary reason why a lot of projects opt for a more centralized type of governance until the project gains sufficient traction and becomes self-sustaining with a larger number of validators. Once the project has sufficient traction and revenue generation, it is financially feasible to keep the high number of validators content and committed to the project.

The best alpha potential lies with early-stage projects. These projects tend to be more centralized due to limitations in sharing financial incentives with many validators. Therefore, filtering out good and harmful projects is crucial.

In the beginning of the project, high level decentralisation allows the team to fix the issues and add features far faster than it would otherwise while operating much leaner. But there is always this risk of things going in the wrong direction. The path between an “efficient” early stage, and centralization being too high of a risk can be very narrow.

The way one can reduce this specific potential risks is to perform a strict due diligence process. This process consists of deep research of numerous parts of the project. KYC of the team behind the project, genesis token supply distribution, governance functionality design, decentralization ramp up roadmap, tokenomics proposals, governance proposals, initial asset distribution plan, and many more. Anybody carrying out this type of DD could have easily avoided falling into a trap such as Squid Game Token.

Do you want to know more about our internal approach to research and how the fund operates and analyze? Hit us up!

Author: David Teufel

Becoming a chart topper with ChatGPT? We just released the very first AI song!

Becoming a chart topper with ChatGPT? We just released the very first AI song!

Stand Out from the Crowd

How PR Can Help Start-Up Founders Establish Themselves as Niche Experts

As a start-up founder, certainly one of your primary goals is to establish yourself as an industry expert and a thought leader in your niche. Doing so can help you gain credibility, attract investors, and furthermore differentiate yourself from competitors. But with so many start-ups vying for attention, how can you position yourself as a niche expert? How can you stand out from the crowd? The answer lies in public relations (PR).

PR is certainly an effective tool that can help start-up founders build their personal brand and position themselves as experts in their field. Here are some ways that founders can use PR to establish themselves as niche experts:

  1. Leverage Your Story: Every founder has a unique story that can resonate with the public. Maybe you come from an unusual background, you have a passion for a particular cause or you probably mastered a significant hurdle. Your story can help you connect with your target audience. Work with a PR professional to craft a compelling story that shows your expertise in your niche.
  2. Create Thought Leadership Content: As a founder, you likely have a wealth of knowledge and insights that can benefit your target audience. With this in mind you can create thought leadership content such as blog posts, white papers, and industry reports that provide valuable insights and show your expertise. Share your content on social media, your website, and with relevant media outlets to establish yourself as a go-to resource in your niche.
  3. Participate in Industry Events: Conferences and trade shows are excellent chances to network with other professionals in your field. Thus you can establish yourself as an expert. Consider speaking at events or participating in panels to share your kow-how with others in your niche. Work with a PR professional to secure speaking engagements and to promote your participation in relevant events.
  4. Engage with the Media: The media can help you reach a broader audience and establish yourself as a niche expert. Reach out to relevant journalists and media outlets to share your story and expertise. Offer to provide commentary on industry trends or offer your knowledge for relevant stories. Work with a PR professional to develop a media strategy.  Hence you can build relationships with journalists and media outlets.
  5. Build a Strong Online Presence: Your online presence is obviously crucial in positioning yourself as a niche expert. Create a professional website that shows your expertise and provides valuable resources to your audience. Develop a social media presence that engages with your audience and provides thought leadership content. Consider partnering with influencers and industry experts to broaden your reach and establish yourself as an authority in your field.
Conclusion

All things considered, public relations (PR) are evidently a powerful tool that start-up founders can use to establish themselves as niche experts. Additionally it helps them to differentiate themselves from competitors. By leveraging their unique story, creating thought leadership content, participating in industry events, interact with the media, and building a strong online presence, start-up founders can prove their expertise. Furthermore they can position themselves as thought leaders in their field. Working with a PR professional can help founders develop a strategy that maximizes their visibility and credibility.  Ultimately that leads to higher credibility, investment, and growth opportunities.

How dangerous SVB’ bankruptcy for Europe’s startups?

How dangerous is SVB’s bankruptcy for Europe’s startups?

It’s the biggest bank failure in the U.S. since the 2008 financial crisis, and the collapse of Silicon Valley Bank (SVB) could yet prove to be a major blow to Europe’s startup ecosystem.

A concatenation of crises in Europe and around the world has been severely impacting our economy for a good three years. The startup or venture capital market is not immune to geopolitical and general economic developments. Historically, however, crises have also had their positive sides. They have often been drivers of innovation. That explains the high investment records and the relatively stable market sentiment (see also: European Venture Sentiment Index). What happens now when the heart of the innovation industry, Silicon Valley Bank (SVB), the most active startup investment bank in the world, suddenly finds itself in trouble due to the rising interest rate environment and poor management? Is this bank critical to the system? Does this bank failure also affect Austrian founders and investors? Was the SVB an isolated case?

SVB’s importance to the innovation sector

SVB was indeed, as FED, FDIC and HM Treasury have stated, in any case not system-critical for the banking sector, but very much so for the innovation sector. Hundreds of thousands of jobs in the technology sector and deposits from over 1,000 venture funds were suddenly at stake. Banks in general seem to be particularly risky at the moment. This week, for example, the rating agency Moody’s changed the short-term rating of the entire U.S. banking sector from “stable” to “negative. Credit Suisse’s credit default swaps – a key indicator of default risk – shot up. In light of this news, we feel very much reminded of 2008. The banking sector is once again in enormous trouble due to high savings volumes, low lending, coupled with the geopolitical crisis, a generally crisis-ridden economy and increased interest rates.

Parallels to 2008?

However, compared to the Lehman Brothers bank failure in 2008, one has to see very clear differences here. Although SVB ranked 16th among all U.S. banks in terms of total assets, it was far smaller than Lehman Brothers. A venture capitalist specializing in the technology industry may be systemically relevant for its niche. But it is of rather minor importance for the global financial system. SVB’s bankruptcy did not cause a global, cross-industry domino effect, as we saw in 2008. It is more likely to be the central banks that are causing the sector to suffer globally.

Experts considered the Silicon Valley Bank as one of the most important financiers for the start-up scene in the USA. But German and Austrian startups are also said to be affected by the insolvency. Worldwide, there is talk of a total of several tens of thousands of affected corporate customers. SVB’s bankruptcy could yet prove to be a major blow to Europe’s startup ecosystem, as it is not clear what HSBC (the new owner of SVB U.K.) will do with the bank. The U.S. bank was very strong and important in our niche, which no one else could or wanted to fill. European banks are risk averse and much more hesitant when it comes to lending to startups, specifically technology companies. They much preferred to finance large real estate developers, but this could be their undoing. The first rumors that Raiffeisen Bank International, which apparently gave credit lines worth billions to Signa Holding, among others, is not doing very well are already making the rounds in Vienna’s financial center.

Impact on European startups and financing bottlenecks

Historically, the innovation sector has generally been more crisis-resistant than liquid stock markets – although not immune to corrections – and has even been spurred on in part by a wave of start-ups based on many releases of talent. What was always needed, however, was venture capital. In this area, the company has recently already had to contend with financing bottlenecks. The loss of SVB has further exacerbated this situation. We now fear that this collapse will discourage other banks even more than before from financing technology companies in the same way.

In the case of our portfolio companies, we have always paid attention to good risk management. Accordingly, SVB’s bankruptcy affected neither them nor our funds. In our crypto fund “Tigris Web3”, we are paying close attention to how the eruptions in the traditional financial sector will play out. Tendentially, our analysts see a great opportunity for decentralized financial providers, provided the stablecoin problem is solved. So-called CBDC (Central Bank Digital Currency) can quickly trigger an upswing in the crypto market. There may be an opportunity in this market even if the traditional financial world wobbles.

 

This article written by Venionaire Capital’s CEO Berthold Baurek-Karlic was originally published as a guest commentary in the Wiener Zeitung. 

 

The promises of Web3: Decentralized finance & NFTS – exploring the future of internet

The promises of Web3: Decentralized finance & NFTS – exploring the future of internet

The Internet has undoubtedly come a long way since its inception. From static web pages to dynamic content, the evolution of the Internet has been remarkable. Right now, we are witnessing a new wave of innovation with the emergence of Web3. Web3 promises to revolutionize the way we interact with the Internet. In this blog article, Venionaire Capital’s Venture Partner and Internet Pioneer Peter Augustin will explain the differences between Web1, Web2 and its youngest sibling Web3 as well as the promises of the latter. 

We also have a video about the development from Web1 to Web3 with our AI educational video expert, Amanda Intelli:

Web1 and Web2: Back to the roots 

In Web1, websites were static, and the only information available was what the website owner provided. Thus it was more or less some kind of a digital business card online. There was no possibility for a two-way communication and users could not interact with the website or its content. With the rise of Web2 websites became more dynamic and operators could interact with users. Social Media platforms like Facebook or Twitter enabled user to like, comment and share content. Thanks to the “like button”, suddenly the internet became a more interactive space.  

However, Web2 has its limitations regarding digital property. Emails were not encrypted, and big data companies like Google could access and literally read our data without our consent. Of course, their motive was not spying on us like some kind of secret service, but because our lives are interesting for them from an advertising and marketing perspective. We have all experienced these re-marketing methods, haven’t we? You search for any product online and suddenly you see ads for this kind of product on every site you visit online. That can be kind of annoying.

For the user Web1 and especially Web2 means the loss of ownership of his data. This is, where Web3 comes in. 

Web3: The Promises and Potential of Cryptography 

The next logical step after Web1 and Web2 is Web3 and it promises to eliminate the limitation of its predecessors. Web3 is finally enabling digital ownership through using blockchain encryption technology, commonly known as “crypto” (short for “cryptography”). 

Cryptography is for sure not an invention of our century. It has been around for thousands of years and is based on mathematical principles. For a long time cryptography was used almost exclusively by secret services to communicate securely and safely. With the rise of Web1 and even more Web2, being online became an eventually almost permanent status. The internet found its way into every household and every smartphone. This development finally created the need for public E2EE (end-to-end encryption) and decentralized networks, thus creating an environment in which digital property can be owned, traded and most important protected. Nonetheless, the responsibility for secure storage of the “private key” that grants access to all digital assets lies in the hands of the data owners. Unquestionably they must handle it like their valuables or important documents in a secure location.

Innovations in Web3 Technology: NFTs and Smart Contracts

Bitcoin is well known to the wider public, and also NFTs are a popular example of how Web3 technology can be used. Remember the previous example about Google having access to our emails? One way to keep your emails away from Google’s goggles (pun intended!) would be converting your emails into NFTs. So every single email is a NFT, a non-fungible token that could be stored on decentralized cloud services. 

Another innovation based on Web3 are smart contracts. They have evolved from other projects, like Ethereum. Smart contracts are digital contracts that are processed between participants on the blockchain. One business area that smart contracts have enabled is called “decentralized finance” (DeFi). This is like a digital bank that processes contracts through blockchain technology rather than human processors. The customers use their wallets to interact with this digital bank.  

Challenges of Web3 

The biggest challenge in Web3 will be to make the user experience as simple as possible and the handling as similar as possible to its predecessors. At the same time, it is crucial to highlight the users’ responsibility that comes with holding digital property. Losing your private key (or the seed phrase that you need to recover it), you might lose access to data without any possibility to recover it. Likewise, the use of smart contracts or DeFi is only recommended after thorough code audits. As contracts are binding, they have to be checked before they are concluded – and in Web3 and Smart Contracts “Code is Law”. 

The future of Web3 

Web3 will not only create new professions like custodians, whose responsibility will be to keep private keys safe or code auditors, who check smart contracts for fraudulent content or errors. It has the potential to disrupt industries like banking, insurance and notary services. Real estate transactions could be completely represented on the blockchain using NFTs and Defi and even government agencies might shift use cases to the blockchain. The possibilities are almost endless. 

In Conclusion 

Web3 promises to revolutionize the way we interact with the Internet. Encryption technology enables secure ownership of digital property, and smart contracts enable new business opportunities. However, it is essential to understand the responsibilities that come with holding digital property and to ensure thorough code audits before entering into smart contracts or DeFi. With Web3, new professions will emerge, and industries will be disrupted. The future of the Internet is exciting, and Web3 is at the forefront of this revolution. 

How wealthy families seek returns

How wealthy families seek returns

The degree to which family offices are willing to take risks is also influenced by the age of their investments. Family portfolios have recently undergone some changes.

In the previous year, investors had to be skillful to achieve positive returns. Apart from a few outliers like the Brazilian Bovespa, stock indices and government bonds ended the year on a downward trend. With the recent rise in interest rates, the previous upward trend in real estate prices has stalled in several locations. These developments have caused significant changes in the portfolios of family offices, which tend to maintain a low profile.

Liquidating real estate

While family offices’ investment approaches are typically kept confidential, recent investment trends have been observed, according to our Managing Partner (CEO) Berthold Baurek-Karlic, who spoke to the Austrian Newspaper “Die Presse“. “I have witnessed the most rapid divestment from real estate in my entire career. The scale and swiftness of the reduction were astounding”, said our CEO.

Family Offices

Over the past few months, Europe’s family offices have been re-allocating their portfolios in a manner that would be unsuitable for investors seeking rapid returns. “The investors we collaborate with are highly resilient”, notes family office specialist Frank Floessel in an interview with “Die Presse”. “The same goes for investments in venture capital or private equity. These asset classes have lower liquidity and exiting them in the short term often incurs significant discounts.”

Investors with Long-term Perspective

Family offices, however, frequently possess the luxury and fortitude to maintain investments for decades. This is why they are instrumental in supporting investors in nascent businesses, where it is uncertain when and how much profits will be earned. Industries reliant on research, in particular, demand long-term commitment.

Our CEO Baurek-Karlic explains: “We are overseeing a space company that would not have been possible without the support of the public sector and family offices. They may have considerable resources, but at the end of the day, the technological undertaking must be feasible, financially viable, and sustainable.”

Baurek-Karlic and Floessel refrain from mentioning the entrepreneurial families that they advise on asset management. However, the experts stress that various offices have diverse investment strategies. While some prioritize philanthropy, others distance themselves from charitable contributions and patronage.

Legacy Wealth

“There are families that wholeheartedly embrace venture investments, while others adopt a highly conservative investment approach. My differentiating factor there is primarily the age of the wealth,” explains Floessel. “The older the wealth, the greater the probability of a more distant relationship with it.”

You can find the full article (published in German) here.

Why the crisis forces startups to rethink

Why the crisis forces startups to rethink

The recent collapse of the Silicon Valley Bank,  that focused on financing tech companies and start-ups, has put even more pressure on an already struggling startup sector. With venture capitalists already exercising caution, the liquidity bottlenecks caused by the collapse have further threatened the scene. Though authorities and investors are working to limit the damage and save parts of the institution, SVB, which collapsed just over a week ago, the increased nervousness on capital markets in Europe and elsewhere is making life even harder for young companies.

Unfortunately, this comes at a time when startup financing is already much more difficult to obtain than it was until the middle of last year. In Austria, for example, startup financing has plummeted by about 86 percent since mid-2022 and has yet to recover in the current year. As a result, the scene is facing another twelve challenging months.

Structure problems

According to reports from the industry, the coming months are unlikely to bring any relief to the struggling startup sector. With interest rates on the rise and a challenging year for investments such as stocks and bonds, capital providers are becoming more risk-averse and less liquid. However, this is only part of the story, as the lack of venture capital in Austria was already a problem before the current crisis.

Our Managing Partner (CEO) Berthold Baurek-Karlic gave his statement to Austrias Newspaper “Die Presse” on this subject.

You can find the full article (in german) here: https://www.diepresse.com/6265069/warum-die-krise-start-ups-zum-umdenken-zwingt?from=rss

Series-A funding: How can startups be more attractive for VCs in 2023

Many startup founders struggle to secure funding for the expansion of their companies after raising the Pre-Seed and Seed rounds, especially in 2023.  CB Insights found that only 48% of startups manage to attract Series-A funding, after a Seed round. Fundraising in Series-A is much more challenging and requires a more careful and detailed strategic planning compared to earlier stages. Startups may fall to liquidity bottlenecks if they fail to successfully attract funding on time which may pressure the company to raise at more unfavourable terms.

Fundraising in 2023

Fundraising environment in 2023 is highly affected by the global macroeconomic environment. Thus startups experience additional difficulties to raise funds due to higher degree of selectivity on the investors’ side since they are more reluctant to deploy funds in new opportunities and rather focused on maintaining their existing portfolio startups. In this article, we elaborate on the specifics of Series-A funding rounds today and we also propose some good practices founders can use.  

What is Series-A

After a startup has raised a seed round and made substantial strides toward realizing its objectives and reached certain milestones, such as developing an MVP and growing an initial customer base, it enters one of the most important stages of investment known as Series-A investment round. This stage of financing is meant to assist startups in growing their businesses and achieving their goals. One of the main characteristics of Series-A funding that differs it from previous stages is a readiness to significantly scale its already proven idea and raise capital mainly for business development. Prior to this investment, startups are expected to develop and launch an MVP, then receive feedback from its initial customers as well as gain some market share. It all comes down to a proof in product-market-fit, which has to be achieved in order to qualify for such a round. Investors consider proven traction as a crucial element for startups to receive Series A funding. Accordingly, founders must back up their claims with traction of a developed product, customers as well as strong professional backgrounds and expertise.

Series-A ranges

In order to attract Series A funding, startups must convince investors of their unique value proposition as well as the ability to fulfil commitments and established targets. A couple years ago more than one million in ARR was the minimum threshold for investors to recognise sufficient traction. Today we see plenty companies showing even EUR 3-5m in ARR. Competition for Venture funding become tougher. In the process of many back-to-back 30 min pitches with busy investors, founders must remain calm and present their companies at their best. Typically, a Series-A funding round in Europe ranges between €1.5m and €8m depending on the company’s industry and geographical focus. Series-A funds are primarily used to scale, expand into new markets, acquire key personnel, and create the infrastructure required for mass expansion. 

When to raise a Series-A

We advise entrepreneurs to take into account the following important factors when deciding on when to raise a Series-A round: 

  • Product-market fit – For obtaining Series-A financing, a startup is expected to demonstrate that its product or service has already established product-market fit and that a company targets a large enough, fast-growing, and highly-scalable market.  
  • Proven traction and room for growth – Established initial customer base and the existence of market demand that can be addressed with more investment.
  • Realistic and well-aligned growth strategy – It is essential to develop a well-defined growth strategy using data of the market entry with MVP to indicate investors that the firm has a clear path to scale its product and achieve the next stage of growth.
  • Experienced team – Having a solid and competent team boosts investor confidence and contributes to securing Series-A.
  • Competitive advantage – It is crucial for receiving Series-A funding to demonstrate a superiority of the startup’s product to similar products in the market using data of a launched MVP.  It is also important to show how it will be able to take over the existing market and its competition’s market share.
  • Runway – It is important to have sufficient runway left to not have pressure in the fundraising and negotiation process. Generally investors like to see at least 9 months runway at the start of the fundraising process (with additional 3 months of fundraising readiness prior to the start of the process).  

 What to include in your pitch-deck

As we already mentioned, when conducting due diligence for a Series-A investment round, investors are more selective. As a result, they have higher demands for portfolio startups at that stage. Therefore, for raising a Series-A round founders should approach creation of a pitchdeck special attentiveness. We recommend including certain items in a pitch deck for the given investment stage: 

  • Goal – A short summary of the company and the value it is contributing 
  • Market – Presentation of market trends and its development, including growth estimates. It should also demonstrate existing demand which can be fulfilled by a startup’s product after its scale through a Series A investment round 
  • Problem – Description and proof of a relatable problem and target audience affected by it
  • Solution – Full description of how your product solves an existing problem, and can monetize it 
  • Traction – Especially relevant for a Series A investment round. It is crucial to demonstrate existing achievements of a startup, which can include revenue growth over time, key accounts and their sources (big clients), and key milestones 
  • Competition – a startup should explain why it is different from its competitors and how they can monetize this difference.
  • Financials – Startups must prepare a comprehensive financial plan that is well-aligned with their growth strategy and realistic in its projections as well as based on past performance. At this stage, it is crucial for startups to have growing financials and KPIs.  

How to raise a Series A

The next stage in raising a Series A investment round is to structure documentation and construct a data room. This would consist of all relevant documents that can verify a startup’s legal position, indicate its business model, demonstrate its proven traction as well as present its growth plan. DOWNLOAD a checklist with all relevant due diligence documents here. It is important to align an upcoming investment round with existing shareholders and prepare the terms of a funding round. After that you will start searching for investors that may be interested in investing in a startup. For that purpose, creation of a target long list of prospective investors would be the best tool. Using that investor long list, founders can start contacting potential investors.

Reaching out to potential investors

The fundraising startup must be ready to respond to challenging inquiries. It has to provide more details regarding the company’s development strategy and financial projections during these meetings. To keep investors interested and involved, it is critical follow up with them after each interaction. This stage can be the most difficult for many startup owners. They face limited access to a network of investors, difficulty with approaching investors, pitching, and negotiating favourable terms. The normally short runway makes fundraising even more stressful for founders. That often leads to mistakes along the way due to having to also operate the business. As a result, many startups fail to raise a Series A funding round.  

Getting the right support

Given the current fundraising environment, one of the most effective solutions to overcome the fundraising complexity could be hiring an consultant. The consultant can help with all issues which startup founders are facing during that process. Experience in deal structuring can be very helpful. Downrounds have become the new normal, but they are not a must if you set the terms right. Venionaire Capitals transaction service team (based in London and Vienna) is an entrepreneurial partner of both startups and investors. As an investment company specialized in Venture Capital and Private Equity, we have been supporting more than 100 deals since 2012.

What we offer

We offer valuable advice through due diligence, valuation, deal structuring, and deal negotiating. Our expertise and investor network enable us to provide startups with the necessary support and guidelines to ensure their chances of successfully securing the funding they need to grow and succeed. We dedicate ourselves to helping startups reach their goals. So we welcome them to work with us and benefit from our expertise. 

In addition to our advisory services, Venionaire will always also look into direct investments through its actively managed funds, for the best deals run by its transaction team.  

 

References: 

Corporate Finance Institute. (2023, February 24). Series A Financing. 

EU-Startups. (2023, February 21). The Startup Funding Journey: A Guide to Pre-Seed, Seed, Series A, B, C, D, and E Funding

Sifted. (2023, March 6). Series A funding for startups: What VCs want to see from founders in 2023. 

 

Author: Denis Voldman

How the Silvergate and Silicon Valley Bank Insolvency effects crypto

Our analyst and fund management team of Tigris Web3 – Austrian Crypto Fund, managed by Venionaire Investment GmbH – are currently monitoring the market situation. They are of course evaluating possible scenarios for following developments. Most important for our investors and clients, Tigris Web3 has had zero exposure in stablecoins, and no exposure to Silvergate or Silicon Valley Bank. The funds strategy is to reduce counter party risk through usage and investment in decentralized projects. This excludes the investment or cooperation with centralized entities like crypto banks, stablecoin issuers and centralised exchanges. The following article gives a wrap up and analytical interpretation of how the current situation might unfold.

What happened so far?

On the 10th of March, the 18th largest US bank by nominal deposit amount, Silicon Valley Bank, has become insolvent. Thus it ended up in FDIC receivership.

The bank became insolvent due to the inherent nature of the current banking system – the fractional reserve system. A fractional reserve system allows banks to not have full treasury backing, but can mark-to-market their reserves, which in the case of a bank run, makes the bank insolvent. Essentially and summed up to the highest level, this is what SVB faced in the second week of march.

Spillover into crypto markets

The insolvency of the bank has heavily hit Circle, the company behind the 2nd biggest stablecoin, USDC. USDC, which is fully backed by US Dollar, had 3.3 billion USD worth of collateral on the accounts of the bank. Even though 3.3 billion USD is shy of 8% of the total market capitalization of USDC, the price of the stablecoin, which is supposed to be as the name indicate – stable at 1 USD, started dropping overnight. The insolvency and liquidation of Silvergate earlier this week, a bank heavily involved in crypto markets, who was also a partner of Circle, is adding fuel to the fire.

 

Figure 1. USDC Market cap (1D Chart) source: coinmarketcap.com

The potential amounts lost on Silvergate are currently unknown. This led to the beginning of a bank run on USDC, with lots of crypto market participants swapping into other stablecoins, large cap crypto currencies or Fiat USD. Naturally, this caused the USDC depeg which at this time is larger than the estimated (potential) gap of collateral caused by the Silicon Valley Bank insolvency.

Another stablecoin project, DAI, has also disconnected in the wake of the scandal. Even though DAI had no exposure to the bank directly, 50% of DAI reserves are backed by USDC as collateral.

Systemic TradFi risks in crypto markets

The irony of this case lies in the fact that theoretically flaws of the traditional finance economy rarely affect crypto projects, as one of their inherent ideological pillar is to create a better, fairer and more resistant system. This case is unique though. The cause of the drop is a systematic counter-party risk. There is no inherent crypto market flaw or fraud at play. One can not blame Circle, as Circle is the most transparent and audited-on-point stable-currency provider. Even Silicon Valley Bank itself can at this point and with the information available so far not been held fully responsible either. Bank runs can happen. In this cause triggered through supposedly poor communication and unlucky timing. Even though their reserves were as conservative as possible, they still tumbled into insolvency due to fractional reserve policy installed by the FED.

Regulatory repercussions

One likely outcome is an even tighter and stronger accelerated approach to the regulation of stablecoins by financial market authorities and central banks – with the ultimate peak of this process being the eventual issuance of CBDCs. Although not very likely, we might even see the FED stepping in in some way in the next days, potentially even taking control of Circle. The meltdown of Luna and UST, and most recently the collapse and alleged fraudulent nature of FTX already previously enforced this step from a regulator’s point of view. Many crypto market participants see this very sceptical due to ideological resons. But increased regulatory security with fully regulated and safe stablecoins creating the ultimate smooth Fiat on- and offramp and DeFi backbone could be one of the necessary triggers for broad adoption of the technology.

Tigris Web3 analysis

Situations like the one with Silicon Valley Bank and Circle enforce our view for the need for decentralized and fully transparent solutions which mitigate counterparty risk. That is one of the main pillars in the investment thesis behind Tigris Web3, a Web3 focused fund managed by Venionaire Investment. Overall we see very low systemic risk at this point for both the portfolio assets and broader thesis of the fund. Circle hast very strong institutional backing. There is too much at stake (both financially and in trustworthiness) compared to what the actual financial damage through the insolvency of Silicon Valley Bank might be. Tigris Web3 is neither invested in USDC, DAI or any other stable coin. Also, we have no funds or accounts with Silicon Valley Bank or Silvergate. If you want to learn more about Tigris Web3, our portfolio assets and projects and investment thesis reach out to david@venionaire.com

Disclaimer

As this situation is currently unfolding, the parties involved are releasing new data and insights on an ongoing basis. This article only reflects the interpretation and knowledge based on information available until 11th March 2023, 10:30am CET. This is no financial advice. Investing in crypto assets is of the highest risk and can lead to a total loss of funds invested.

 

Authors: David Teufel & Ivo Pernar

Samurai of Tech

A brief historical digression

A Japanese samurai was once a loyal servant and protector, an imperial guard, a warrior with a strict code of honor. They lived according to the “Hagakure”, which contains about 1,300 lessons and dealt with both daily life and the relationship between lord and follower. The traditional warrior nobility of the samurai experienced its heyday in the 11th and 12th centuries A.D. The samurai, originally in the service of the emperor and nobility, became the ruling class of society with the rise of the shogunate and the establishment of a military aristocracy. The demise of the samurai 150 years ago also represents the rise of modern Japan. However, the myth and fascination with these warriors still exists today far beyond the borders of their homeland.

Between past and future

Japan is a country of (supposed) contrasts, performing a daily balancing act between tradition and modernity. While moving between centuries-old shrines and the most modern high-rise architecture, between traditional teahouses and eccentric maid cafés, and yet, despite the apparent contradictions, you can easily find a way between the centuries.

Let’s draw mental parallels and dare this balancing act for our business. Today, our “servants” are our digital or high-tech companions. From artificial intelligence, robots and drones to countless apps, that now make every facet of our daily lives easier. In Japan, you will find a large number of world leading corporations. They almost naturally have large powerful corporate venture vehicles. The few investment banks, some of which manage over 100 corporate venture funds, could be described as shoguns (rulers) in the ecosystem. Perfection is a social and cultural requirement, and this is achieved by specialists. Accordingly, these funds are often managed externally by specialists.

Behind the scenes

Japan’s technology giants are global players, but in Japan itself they like to keep to themselves. To this day, there are hardly any non-Japanese top managers, and the global subsidiaries’ leadership always contain Japanese managers. English as a foreign language is a matter of course for the educated Japanese, but they prefer to do business  in their mother tongue. It is therefore advisable for Western business people to be able to speak at least a few bars.

If we stick to our mental balancing act, these technology giants are the modern samurai of their industries. The innovative leadership of these “Samurai of Tech” goes far beyond Asia. They invest, develop spin-offs together with research institutes and have a strong presence in the international “super hubs” of the startup scene – for example in Israel, Silicon Valley or India. For the corporations, close ties with global startup hubs seem not only practicable, but actually extremely important in terms of their claim to long-term honourable cooperation with innovators. A good reputation ensures access to the best talent and thus the samurai’s superiority in the innovation race.

How to deal with crisis

Right now Europe is just learning to deal with the next and arguably most severe crisis in recent history. Japan has meanwhile perfected living in the crisis. Interest rates are still negative, inflation is not a major issue, the domestic market is strong and the country’s international position is excellent. Japanese are strategists, so it’s not surprising that the appetite for risk to increase activity in Europe – especially venture capital and Web3 – is growing strongly.

In Europe, however, Japanese corporations and corporate venture vehicles are currently hardly present. The European market is considered attractive, but unfortunately also very complex. Various hubs, regional cultural differences, many languages and different laws (depending on the region) in Europe are understandably deterrent. Those who want to be successful therefore ally themselves with strong partners – although this requires some patience. Strong partnerships are based on trust and building this trust does not work overnight.

Building Bridges between Japan and Austria

Venionaire Capital has very good experiences in working with Japanese co-investors and business partners. Attending the City Tech Tokyo Conference and speaking at an official Deloitte side event has greatly strengthened our bi-directional relationship. We are looking forward to a strong delegation from Japan attending the World Venture Forum in Kitzbühel.

You have questions regarding the Japanese market, or would like to find a strong partner for corporate venture funds (full service), or as a scale-up to enter the European market? Please contact our Advisory Team, led by our Managing Partner, Berthold Baurek-Karlic.

WHERE TO FIND US

VIENNA, OFFICE (HQ)

Babenbergerstraße 9/12,
A-1010 Vienna, Austria (EU)
office@venionaire.com

SAN FRANCISCO, USA

1355 Market St. #488
San Francisco CA 94103
sfo@venionaire.com

NEW YORK CITY, USA

122 East 37th Street
First Floor
New York, NY 10016
nyc@venionaire.com

LONDON, UK

Gable House, 239 Regents Park Road
London N3 3LF
office@venionaire.com

MUNSBACH, LUX

3 rue Gabriel Lippmann
5365 Munsbach
office@venionaire.com

LOOKING FOR FUNDING?

FOR STARTUPS

Venionaire Capital exclusively invests through the European Super Angels Club, for more information and application please go to the website. We do not accept direct investment proposals via this website.